In a message dated 2/23/2008 2:54:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, geniice@gmail.com writes:
This would be the youtube method. Unlike youtube however we aim to be free content something not consistent with hosting large numbers of blatant copyvios. We care about copyright and this means we require certain standards.>>
----------------------------------- You are mistaking my position. My position is not *for blatant copyvios*. However photos are removed, not because they are blatant copyvios, but simply because they are not blatant free-images.
You're advocating a 10%+ position, while I'm advocating a 90%+ position. I'm not arguing against your position at all. I'm saying betacommandbot goes far far too far.
Will Johnson
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
On 23/02/2008, WJhonson@aol.com WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/23/2008 2:54:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
geniice@gmail.com writes:
This would be the youtube method. Unlike youtube however we aim to be free content something not consistent with hosting large numbers of blatant copyvios. We care about copyright and this means we require certain standards.>>
You are mistaking my position. My position is not *for blatant copyvios*. However photos are removed, not because they are blatant copyvios, but simply because they are not blatant free-images.
False. BCB isn't getting involved with images tagged with free licenses.
You're advocating a 10%+ position, while I'm advocating a 90%+ position.
Huh?
I'm not arguing against your position at all. I'm saying betacommandbot goes far far too far.
How?
On 23/02/2008, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/02/2008, WJhonson@aol.com WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
I'm not arguing against your position at all. I'm saying betacommandbot goes far far too far.
How?
Yes, how? Is Betacommandbot labeling images that are in fact not covered by WP:NONFREE?
Or is your fundamental disagreement with WP:NONFREE and the Foundation policies it comes from, and you're attacking Betacommand for running a bot that labels violations of said policies at all?
- d.