I have to say, I'm sorry to see this template's existence. The failure of various free licenses to "talk" to one another is rapidly becoming one of the biggest barriers to the creation of free content, and with the rapid ascent of Creative Commons, frankly, Wikipedia is looking a little crusty in its model. It's very hard to utilize bits of Wikipedia in creative works, because the GFDL kinda sucks for that. I'd have a tough time applying the GFDL to a visual work. (How would I link back?) Until a better solution comes along (I'm hoping very much that the new version of the GFDL that they're working on will have some provision about other free licenses) multi-licensing seems to me a necessary evil. In particular, the no sign over the CC image feels in poor taste to me. -Snowspinner On Dec 5, 2004, at 6:42 PM, Trevor Caira wrote:

In response, I've finally decided to multilicense my contributions under a Creative Commons license. I've been meaning to for some time, but I've just been too lazy to really consider it. I've finally done so. Thanks for the impetus. :-) John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]]) Trevor Caira wrote: