G'day Bryan,
Seriously, though, I'm still looking for a response on my request for details when you said "analysis has been done, results will be published" regarding the initial disabling of anon page creation. Who did the analysis? Or did you answer in a different thread that I haven't been reading? I know I'm being a hardass about this, but so far this has been the only lead I'm aware of indicating that any such analysis might actually be taking place.
While there are aspects of dear old Gregory I would undoubtedly like to reflect (being able to take a decent fscking photograph for a start), we are, in fact, different people, and would both prefer not to be confused!
Cheers,
Mark Gallagher wrote:
G'day Bryan,
Seriously, though, I'm still looking for a response on my request for details when you said "analysis has been done, results will be published" regarding the initial disabling of anon page creation. Who did the analysis? Or did you answer in a different thread that I haven't been reading? I know I'm being a hardass about this, but so far this has been the only lead I'm aware of indicating that any such analysis might actually be taking place.
While there are aspects of dear old Gregory I would undoubtedly like to reflect (being able to take a decent fscking photograph for a start), we are, in fact, different people, and would both prefer not to be confused!
Gah! I actually went and looked up Gregory's post where he said that to compare author names before I responded, I don't know how I could have _still_ crossed wires with "Gregory" and "Gallagher" with them right in front of me like that. I'd blame Thunderbird's refusal to open two different emails at the same time, but that would just be lame. :)