Look again bratsche, you just reverted the page, putting the edits of an uninvolved user, over the signatures of 4 people.
It doesn't matter what excuse redwolf24 used, he is an involved admin, he'd already reached the conclusions below yesterday per his "outside" view on the page. Note that he gave no edits or specifics in support of his "view" either.
You might want to note also, that 172 went to his talk page about this issue, right after voting for him for bureaucrat. -- Silverback
-------------- Original message --------------
First off, we need get the facts straight here. The block log shows not a 3RR violation, but something else. Let's take a look:
18:22, October 16, 2005 Redwolf24blocked " User:Silverback " with an expiry time of 24 hours (reverts incessantly, removing information from his RfC , has been attacking 172 a lot lately, hasn't been too civil, hopefully this block will turn him around.)
This doesn't seem to be much of a 3RR block, but more of a block for disruption, violating [[WP:NPA]], and removing comments from the RfC without reason.
--[[:en:User:Bratsche|Ben]]
On 10/16/05, actionforum@comcast.net wrote:
Redwolf24 just blocked me, allegedly for 3RR on the RfC page against me where he had taken a voting position against me. We really need to develop a fair process.
-- Bratsche-It means "viola!" _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
actionforum@comcast.net wrote:
Look again bratsche, you just reverted the page, putting the edits of an uninvolved user, over the signatures of 4 people.
It doesn't matter what excuse redwolf24 used, he is an involved admin, he'd already reached the conclusions below yesterday per his "outside" view on the page. Note that he gave no edits or specifics in support of his "view" either.
You might want to note also, that 172 went to his talk page about this issue, right after voting for him for bureaucrat. -- Silverback
Silverback,
If you want someone on this mailing list to do something about it, you'll have to explain why the block is not warranted - in other words, why the block reason that whoever blocked you is given is incorrect in each point mentioned.
The reason you have to explain why you have not done the things you are supposedly blocked for is that admins tend to trust each other's judgments and are reluctant to get involved in cases where they are unfamiliar with the circumstances.
If you can provide me with reasoning, supported by links to diffs on Wikipedia which I can validate your reasoning against, and if the people who are 'opposed' to you in this dispute do not respond adequately, in my opinion, to your comments, I will unblock you (and talk to the other people involved in the dispute about it).
Chris
I don't think you have a right to remove comments on your own RfC. A request for comment is just that: a chance for those both involved and uninvolved to comment on an article or user's situation. [[User:Fawcett5]]'s comments was also at the end of a list, not above signatures. If there is confusion, look at the timestamp on the sigs. That's why we have them.
-Ben
On 10/16/05, actionforum@comcast.net actionforum@comcast.net wrote:
Look again bratsche, you just reverted the page, putting the edits of an uninvolved user, over the signatures of 4 people.
It doesn't matter what excuse redwolf24 used, he is an involved admin, he'd already reached the conclusions below yesterday per his "outside" view on the page. Note that he gave no edits or specifics in support of his "view" either.
You might want to note also, that 172 went to his talk page about this issue, right after voting for him for bureaucrat. -- Silverback
-------------- Original message --------------
First off, we need get the facts straight here. The block log shows not
a
3RR violation, but something else. Let's take a look:
18:22, October 16, 2005 Redwolf24blocked " User:Silverback " with an expiry time of 24 hours (reverts incessantly, removing information from
his
RfC , has been attacking 172 a lot lately, hasn't been too civil, hopefully
this
block will turn him around.)
This doesn't seem to be much of a 3RR block, but more of a block for disruption, violating [[WP:NPA]], and removing comments from the RfC
without
reason.
--[[:en:User:Bratsche|Ben]]
On 10/16/05, actionforum@comcast.net wrote:
Redwolf24 just blocked me, allegedly for 3RR on the RfC page against me where he had taken a voting position against me. We really need to develop a fair process.
-- Bratsche-It means "viola!" _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Bratsche-It means "viola!"