eliezer imposes an unfair, seriously biased and inaccurate article dealing with messianic judaism. when i had previously raised my concerns in the discussion page and point out the gross misinformation in the main article, eliezar would delete my tag. (as a side note, i observed others tag this article as violating the npov policy only to have their tags deleted without explanation.)
i expressed my concerns on the talk page, only to be vandalised by OpenInfo and blocked by Eliezer. Eliezer prevented me from explaining: 1. where the npov policy was violated in several places; 2. show where the facts were seriously inaccurate and, 3. show where the author contradicted himself. eliezer blocked me without sufficient warning per the blocking policy.
while i strongly disagree with eliezer's anti-messianic agenda, i do not feel i vandalized the article or site in any way. this site's policy allows me the freedom to edit articles that violate the npov in a good faith effort to make them more accurate.
i believe eliezer will only force his anti-messianic agenda upon the public and a new administrator needs to be appointed who will fairly address the topic. thank you for your prompt and open-minded attention to this matter.
Sending one message to the list is quite enough. If you are talking about reversions like http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=3654033... then Eliezer was quite right to make them. Articles are about facts, and questioning the validity of any of them, should happen on the talk page.
Where and when did you post those concerns on the talk page? Just tagging is not enough. I've seen several people tag the article as totally disputed without putting any discussion on the talk page.
It would help a lot of you posted diff links to the edits you are referring to see WP:DIFF.
About the first editorial comment. If the article says Messianic Judaism started in the 1800s, then are you sure Judaism was actually called Messianic in the 1490s? Jews may have died during Crusades or at the hands of Queen Isabelle, but they may simply be a completely different form of Judaism altogether.
Mgm
On 1/26/06, david weiss loveisrael@mail.com wrote:
eliezer imposes an unfair, seriously biased and inaccurate article dealing with messianic judaism. when i had previously raised my concerns in the discussion page and point out the gross misinformation in the main article, eliezar would delete my tag. (as a side note, i observed others tag this article as violating the npov policy only to have their tags deleted without explanation.)
i expressed my concerns on the talk page, only to be vandalised by OpenInfo and blocked by Eliezer. Eliezer prevented me from explaining:
- where the npov policy was violated in several places; 2. show where
the facts were seriously inaccurate and, 3. show where the author contradicted himself. eliezer blocked me without sufficient warning per the blocking policy.
while i strongly disagree with eliezer's anti-messianic agenda, i do not feel i vandalized the article or site in any way. this site's policy allows me the freedom to edit articles that violate the npov in a good faith effort to make them more accurate.
i believe eliezer will only force his anti-messianic agenda upon the public and a new administrator needs to be appointed who will fairly address the topic. thank you for your prompt and open-minded attention to this matter.
-- ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l