My post wasn't exclusively directed to you, and I'm not interested in
responding to that.
El_C
No I didn't. I was making a point for you, but I
don't think you've
worked it out yet. I'm >not a troll, I'm not a
vandal. I speak the
truth as I see it. I accept that I can make errors >and I accept
correction when it is valid. If I have a major flaw it is that I am
far too quick >to point out the flaws in others, and to take pleasure
in doing so, the amount of my >pleasure in direct proportion to their
level of arrogance.
The Prime Minister of Australia sees the
Governor-General as
Australia's head of state. >That's not my opinion,
it's the opinion of
the head of government, and it's not up to you >or any other editor to
deny it. Furthermore, it's not just the Prime Minister of this
country, it is senior members of both parties. Simon
Crean, during
his time as Leader >of the Opposition also called the
Governor-General
the head of state. You have the >leaders of both of the major parties
in Federal Parliament saying the same thing.
That doesn't make the Governor-General the
undisputed head of state,
but one point >you don't seem to have grasped is
that there IS a
dispute. Not between you and me and >any other editor; our opinions
don't matter a damn. There is a diiference of opinion at >the highest
levels of national leadership.
And now, if you look at [[Government of Australia]] we
see that
someone else has stuck >his head up and pointed out what I've said
for
the past six months, and they have >provided verifiable sources, as I
did. And surprise, surprise, we see the same mindless >reverts and the
same threats coming from the same editors.
I say that you should assume good faith, Mister Admin.
That's my point.