My post wasn't exclusively directed to you, and I'm not interested in responding to that.

El_C

No I didn't. I was making a point for you, but I don't think you've

worked it out yet. I'm >not a troll, I'm not a vandal. I speak the truth as I see it. I accept that I can make errors >and I accept correction when it is valid. If I have a major flaw it is that I am far too quick >to point out the flaws in others, and to take pleasure in doing so, the amount of my >pleasure in direct proportion to their level of arrogance.

The Prime Minister of Australia sees the Governor-General as

Australia's head of state. >That's not my opinion, it's the opinion of the head of government, and it's not up to you >or any other editor to deny it. Furthermore, it's not just the Prime Minister of this

country, it is senior members of both parties. Simon Crean, during

his time as Leader >of the Opposition also called the Governor-General the head of state. You have the >leaders of both of the major parties in Federal Parliament saying the same thing.

That doesn't make the Governor-General the undisputed head of state,

but one point >you don't seem to have grasped is that there IS a dispute. Not between you and me and >any other editor; our opinions don't matter a damn. There is a diiference of opinion at >the highest levels of national leadership.

And now, if you look at [[Government of Australia]] we see that

someone else has stuck >his head up and pointed out what I've said for the past six months, and they have >provided verifiable sources, as I did. And surprise, surprise, we see the same mindless >reverts and the same threats coming from the same editors.

I say that you should assume good faith, Mister Admin. That's my point.