Someone has conveniently deleted all the criticism from the lead, in violation of [[WP:LEAD]].
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=1758039...
I'm planning to go in tonight and do some re-adding and tagging. Will you be able to watch my back?
jayjg wrote:
Someone has conveniently deleted all the criticism from the lead, in violation of [[WP:LEAD]].
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=1758039...
I'm planning to go in tonight and do some re-adding and tagging. Will you be able to watch my back?
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Hm, are you sure this post wasn't intended for a more "sympathetic" list.
We certainly can't have an article that's the least bit sympathetic to these miscreants, so I'm sure lots of people will watch your back as you put back all the carefully balanced criticism. We can't have them sneaking up behind you, can we?
Doc
Doc
On 2007.12.20 10:57:57 -0500, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com scribbled 0.3K characters:
Someone has conveniently deleted all the criticism from the lead, in violation of [[WP:LEAD]].
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=1758039...
I'm planning to go in tonight and do some re-adding and tagging. Will you be able to watch my back?
I don't think this is really appropriate for WikiEN-l, even assuming that this is not a violation of the spirit of WP:CANVASS at the least.
-- gwern X400 NAVCM F-22 SERT rain RIT Gulf BLACKER clones cryptanalysis
On 20/12/2007, gwern0@gmail.com gwern0@gmail.com wrote:
On 2007.12.20 10:57:57 -0500, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com scribbled 0.3Kcharacters:
Someone has conveniently deleted all the criticism from the lead, in violation of [[WP:LEAD]].
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=1758039...
I'm planning to go in tonight and do some re-adding and tagging. Will you be able to watch my back?
I don't think this is really appropriate for WikiEN-l, even assuming that this is not a violation of the spirit of WP:CANVASS at the least.
-- gwern X400 NAVCM F-22 SERT rain RIT Gulf BLACKER clones cryptanalysis
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
It's highly inappropriate. Was this mistakenly sent, Jayjg?
I wouldn't call it canvassing, but strange.
On Dec 20, 2007 11:32 AM, Red Rocket redrocketboy@googlemail.com wrote:
On 20/12/2007, gwern0@gmail.com gwern0@gmail.com wrote:
On 2007.12.20 10:57:57 -0500, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com scribbled 0.3Kcharacters:
Someone has conveniently deleted all the criticism from the lead, in violation of [[WP:LEAD]].
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=1758039...
I'm planning to go in tonight and do some re-adding and tagging. Will you be able to watch my back?
I don't think this is really appropriate for WikiEN-l, even assuming that this is not a violation of the spirit of WP:CANVASS at the least.
-- gwern X400 NAVCM F-22 SERT rain RIT Gulf BLACKER clones cryptanalysis
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
It's highly inappropriate. Was this mistakenly sent, Jayjg?
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
On Dec 20, 2007 11:32 AM, Red Rocket redrocketboy@googlemail.com wrote:
On 20/12/2007, gwern0@gmail.com gwern0@gmail.com wrote:
On 2007.12.20 10:57:57 -0500, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com scribbled 0.3Kcharacters:
Someone has conveniently deleted all the criticism from the lead, in violation of [[WP:LEAD]].
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=1758039...
I'm planning to go in tonight and do some re-adding and tagging. Will you be able to watch my back?
I don't think this is really appropriate for WikiEN-l, even assuming that this is not a violation of the spirit of WP:CANVASS at the least.
-- gwern X400 NAVCM F-22 SERT rain RIT Gulf BLACKER clones cryptanalysis
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
It's highly inappropriate. Was this mistakenly sent, Jayjg?
Sorry, yes, sent in error.
gwern0@gmail.com wrote:
On 2007.12.20 10:57:57 -0500, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com scribbled 0.3K characters:
Someone has conveniently deleted all the criticism from the lead, in violation of [[WP:LEAD]].
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Messianic_Judaism&diff=1758039...
I'm planning to go in tonight and do some re-adding and tagging. Will you be able to watch my back?
I don't think this is really appropriate for WikiEN-l, even assuming that this is not a violation of the spirit of WP:CANVASS at the least.
-- gwern X400 NAVCM F-22 SERT rain RIT Gulf BLACKER clones cryptanalysis
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
No, I'm really glad he posted this to wikien-1. That way he'll not just get sympathetic input from the like minded, but he'll get a spectrum of views, which will ensure his editing is truly NPOV. I salute jayig for doing this. Wikipedia at its neutral best.
This decision is so much better than if he'd, say, intended to post it to a single-issue mailing list of editors who share his outlook - because that would truly be deplorable canvasing.
Long live NPOV
doc
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, doc wrote:
No, I'm really glad he posted this to wikien-1. That way he'll not just get sympathetic input from the like minded, but he'll get a spectrum of views, which will ensure his editing is truly NPOV. I salute jayig for doing this. Wikipedia at its neutral best.
This decision is so much better than if he'd, say, intended to post it to a single-issue mailing list of editors who share his outlook - because that would truly be deplorable canvasing.
We all know that no such thing exists, right?
On Dec 21, 2007 3:41 AM, doc doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com wrote:
No, I'm really glad he posted this to wikien-1. That way he'll not just get sympathetic input from the like minded, but he'll get a spectrum of views, which will ensure his editing is truly NPOV. I salute jayig for doing this. Wikipedia at its neutral best.
This decision is so much better than if he'd, say, intended to post it to a single-issue mailing list of editors who share his outlook - because that would truly be deplorable canvasing.
The other addressees of the mail are all individuals. Copied from the headers:
From: jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com To: aviwiki@gmail.com, "Pinchas Cohen" PinchasC@gmail.com, "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org, "Beit Or" beitor06@gmail.com, "Humus Sapiens" humus.sapiens@gmail.com
Stephen Bain wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007 3:41 AM, doc doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com wrote:
No, I'm really glad he posted this to wikien-1. That way he'll not just get sympathetic input from the like minded, but he'll get a spectrum of views, which will ensure his editing is truly NPOV. I salute jayig for doing this. Wikipedia at its neutral best.
This decision is so much better than if he'd, say, intended to post it to a single-issue mailing list of editors who share his outlook - because that would truly be deplorable canvasing.
The other addressees of the mail are all individuals. Copied from the headers:
From: jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com To: aviwiki@gmail.com, "Pinchas Cohen" PinchasC@gmail.com, "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org, "Beit Or" beitor06@gmail.com, "Humus Sapiens" humus.sapiens@gmail.com
Always wondered how I got reverted so quickly at the old Jews for Jesus page.