Tucci wrote:
I stumbled across the talk page at Vodun a week ago
or so, and some IP asked if it was the same thing as
Voodoo and if so, if the article should be moved there
because Voodoo is the more commonly used term. That
led me to the following conclusion:
I'd like to propose a minor modification to the
current naming conventions that I think will make a
lot of the different sides happy. If experts in a
field nearly universally use a different term than the
general population, the expert term should be used to
name the article. The only two I can think of that
this would apply to is Vodun and Inuit instead of
Voodoo and Eskimo. Asking my seven reasonably
educated co-workers, six out of the seven have no idea
what Vodun is (though they've heard of Voodoo) and one
thought it was the capital of "one of them southeast
Asian countries" (for those keeping score, seven out
of eight paramedics are unfamiliar with the word, with
myself the only exception). Four out of the seven
were familiar with the word "Inuit" but said they
probably wouldn't think to use it. Three claim to
have never heard it before, though all seven knew what
an Eskimo was. Because experts in the field of
religion and anthropology use "Vodun" and "Inuit" to
the complete exclusion of "Voodoo" and "Eskimo"
(except maybe to explain that they're the same thing
at the beginning of an essay or paper or whatever), I
think the Wikipedia would seem a bit... well, dumb,
having an article about Eskimos when everybody
involved with the people in question refer to them as
Inuit.
The terms Eskimo and Inuk are not equivalent. Properly used the term
Eskimo is a broader one of whom the Inuit are a subset. The term Inuit
does not apply to those people who are in the more western, Siberian
part of the range. People in the eastern part of the range consider the
use of "Eskimo" as politically incorrect, and if they had their way
would probably also insist on changing the name of the Edmonton football
team. The best approach would be to move the material to two separate
articles that reflect the different usages.
Polls of a small local groups about what terms they know does not strike
me as a sound basis for deciding what name(s) we should use.
I am very much less certain about usage of voodoo/vodun. I've always
considered that vodun was the Dahomean language word for God and that
voodoo was derived from that. You are probably right to put everything
under "vodun".