I would like someone to officially warn Moreschi against making personal attacks. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/C...
As an administrator, Moreschi should be setting an example to others and not break Wikipedia policy whenever he feels like it. Nobody should resort to personal attacks, especially not an administrator who should know better. (but we all know that administrators can get away with flouting policy whenever they like, just look at Cyde for instance)
I would also like MichaelLinnear cautioned and warned for same (as well as publishing private contact information). See: http://nathanr.ca/Images/WikiDefamation.jpg (the edit was oversighted at my insistence) The edit MichaelLinnear made can be considered libel and defamation, designed to damage my reputation (it's damaged enough). He deserves a block nevermind a warning.
It is rather biased that my very fair requests are ignored just because I'm a banned user. If an active user in good standing were to ask this, their wishes would be respected.
My status as a blocked user is irrelevent. I absolutely insist that a fair-minded admin should do the right thing here and warn both users - publicly (where I can see it) and not behind closed doors.
Thank you for your time, Nathan (User:nathanrdotcom)
On 5/8/07, Nathan nriorperzy@kriocoudek.mailexpire.com wrote:
I would like someone to officially warn Moreschi against making personal attacks. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/C...
Heh heh, good parody of a newb-...Wait, you're serious? You actually think "whinging so pathetically" is a personal attack worthy of sanction? I'd call whining about someone calling you a whiner ironic, but somehow I actually expected this. If you were Anglius, I'd sympathize. Since you aren't, you are nothing more than a hypocrite with a fascinating case of selective amnesia. Let me jog your memory a little.
"Given that Cyde and SlimVirgin are both infamous for being dicks..." "Does Cyde have ANY redeeming qualities whatsoever?" "I would never link to anything written by Cyde, even if I agreed with it - I won't give the bastard the satisfaction" "I never thought much of Gmaxwell since he did one thing to earn himself the title of "dick"." "Ryulong is batshit insane (now at least) if you ask me."
And to think, I almost missed this conversation. In reference to coming back to Wikipedia: Gomi: If they're watching your IP, of course, you need to get a new ISP. Nathan: I have a plan and (without getting specific), the estimated time of implementation is by end of March.
I would also like MichaelLinnear cautioned and warned for same (as well as publishing private contact information). See: http://nathanr.ca/Images/WikiDefamation.jpg (the edit was oversighted at my insistence) The edit MichaelLinnear made can be considered libel and defamation, designed to damage my reputation (it's damaged enough).
Let me make sure I'm getting this straight: Michael Linnear says something you consider to be libelous and defamation of your character. You complain and it's oversighted in order to protect your privacy. Then - and this is the part where my brain starts spitting out ABORT/RETRY/FAIL errors - you go to a public mailing list and post a screenshot of the edit in question in order to...what? Further publicize and spread the libelous information? To further damage your own reputation?
But really, the best part is that someone already warned him. You would never guess who though, but would you give it the ol' college go, just for me? I'd go into my happy place if you did. Don't worry, I'll tell you the answer in a few lines, I wouldn't leave you hanging like that.
Think you got it?
I bet you didn't!
It was your old friend Sceptre.
Thank you for your time, Nathan (User:nathanrdotcom)
No, thank *YOU*.
-Chris Croy
Stuff and nonsense.
Firstly, I'm not an adminstrator.
Secondly, my tolerance for banned users is limited.
Thirdly, my tolerance for banned users who sockpuppet is even more limited.
Fourthly, my tolerance for banned users who harass me via email when their socks get nailed is non-existent. Jacob Peters, for all his flaws, has not resorted to that. You did.
Quite frankly, I think the pot just spectacularly called the kettle black. You spent a large amount of time enthusiastically denigrating those whom you dislike at Wikipedia Review. I suggest you return there. As others have documented, your complaints are nonsensical hypocrisy.
With all due respect,
Moreschi
_________________________________________________________________ Play your part in making history - Email Britain! http://www.emailbritain.co.uk/
On Wed, 09 May 2007 19:42:52 +0100, "Christiano Moreschi" moreschiwikiman@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Quite frankly, I think the pot just spectacularly called the kettle black. You spent a large amount of time enthusiastically denigrating those whom you dislike at Wikipedia Review. I suggest you return there. As others have documented, your complaints are nonsensical hypocrisy.
That is far more measured than my instinctive response to Croy, which can safely be left to the imagination - note that the invective module should be loaded before running imagination 1.0 for this task.
Guy (JzG)
C.J. Croy wrote:
On 5/8/07, Nathan nriorperzy@kriocoudek.mailexpire.com wrote:
I would like someone to officially warn Moreschi against making personal attacks. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/C...
Heh heh, good parody of a newb-...Wait, you're serious? You actually think "whinging so pathetically" is a personal attack worthy of sanction? I'd call whining about someone calling you a whiner ironic, but somehow I actually expected this. If you were Anglius, I'd sympathize. Since you aren't, you are nothing more than a hypocrite with a fascinating case of selective amnesia. Let me jog your memory a little.
"Given that Cyde and SlimVirgin are both infamous for being dicks..." "Does Cyde have ANY redeeming qualities whatsoever?" "I would never link to anything written by Cyde, even if I agreed with it - I won't give the bastard the satisfaction" "I never thought much of Gmaxwell since he did one thing to earn himself the title of "dick"." "Ryulong is batshit insane (now at least) if you ask me."
I don't know how guilty Nathan may be of anything, and I'm not interested in finding out. Still, statements that presume guilt, or that accuse someone of whinging could hardly be called respectful language. He may very well have made all the comments above, but that does not justify having the admin descend into the same gutter. Admins should rise above the fray with more dispassionate and neutral language.
Ec
From: Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Personal attacks. Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 19:15:45 -0700
C.J. Croy wrote:
On 5/8/07, Nathan nriorperzy@kriocoudek.mailexpire.com wrote:
I would like someone to officially warn Moreschi against making personal
attacks.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/C...
Heh heh, good parody of a newb-...Wait, you're serious? You actually think "whinging so pathetically" is a personal attack worthy of sanction? I'd call whining about someone calling you a whiner ironic, but somehow I actually expected this. If you were Anglius, I'd sympathize. Since you aren't, you are nothing more than a hypocrite with a fascinating case of selective amnesia. Let me jog your memory a little.
"Given that Cyde and SlimVirgin are both infamous for being dicks..." "Does Cyde have ANY redeeming qualities whatsoever?" "I would never link to anything written by Cyde, even if I agreed with it - I won't give the bastard the satisfaction" "I never thought much of Gmaxwell since he did one thing to earn himself the title of "dick"." "Ryulong is batshit insane (now at least) if you ask me."
I don't know how guilty Nathan may be of anything, and I'm not interested in finding out. Still, statements that presume guilt, or that accuse someone of whinging could hardly be called respectful language. He may very well have made all the comments above, but that does not justify having the admin descend into the same gutter. Admins should rise above the fray with more dispassionate and neutral language.
Ec
Perhaps, but spades are spades, and sockpuppeting blocked users are just that. In addition, if that refers to me, I'm not an admin now, nor was I at the time I said that. Had I been, possibly I would not have phrased my remark is exactly that manner.
Moreschi
_________________________________________________________________ Could you be the guest MSN Movies presenter? Click Here to Audition http://www.lightscameraaudition.co.uk