In a message dated 3/1/2008 5:25:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, geniice@gmail.com writes:
Correct to what? the image has not been released under a free license thus the only alternative to a fair use claim would be delete.
---- The alternative as we've discussed here just recently would be to correct the fair-use claim. That is the most sensible approach instead of removing valid and useful content for merely beauracratic reasons.
By the way, the deletion page does not state how to retrieve the item. It was mentioned here that you can retrieve deleted images. I'd like to know how.
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
On 02/03/2008, WJhonson@aol.com WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
The alternative as we've discussed here just recently would be to correct the fair-use claim.
That is the most sensible approach instead of removing valid and useful content for merely beauracratic reasons.
What makes you think that there was a legit fair use case to be made?
By the way, the deletion page does not state how to retrieve the item. It was mentioned here that you can retrieve deleted images. I'd like to know how.
Usual by finding a sympathetic admin