On 20/10/06, SPUI drspui@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:State_Road_913_%28Florida% 29#A_bulletproof_argument... Am I right or is the IP right? Do commercially-produced maps that show an unsigned designation continuing along a causeway trump Department of Transportation sources?
SPUI, what are you seeking from this mailing list?
A final and binding judgement that you're right, from all the road experts on this mailing list?
A formal recognition that you are to be regarded as the authority on the subject of roads, and granted control over the content of all road-related articles in Wikipedia?
Daniel P. B. Smith wrote:
On 20/10/06, SPUI drspui@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:State_Road_913_%28Florida% 29#A_bulletproof_argument... Am I right or is the IP right? Do commercially-produced maps that show an unsigned designation continuing along a causeway trump Department of Transportation sources?
SPUI, what are you seeking from this mailing list?
A final and binding judgement that you're right, from all the road experts on this mailing list?
A formal recognition that you are to be regarded as the authority on the subject of roads, and granted control over the content of all road-related articles in Wikipedia?
I'm seeking advice, and I'm getting confirmation that there are too many dicks on Wikipedia. Thanks.
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 22:41:48 -0400, SPUI drspui@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeking advice, and I'm getting confirmation that there are too many dicks on Wikipedia. Thanks.
I guess you appreciate the inherent irony in that remark.
Guy (JzG)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Daniel P. B. Smith stated for the record:
SPUI, what are you seeking from this mailing list?
Attention.
- -- Sean Barrett | The other side to the Wikipedia that nobody really sean@epoptic.com | likes to talk about... is that a large portion of | the content is fairly pornographic, and actually | quite lewd. --Encyclopedia Britannica spokesman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
SPUI stated for the record:
Sean Barrett wrote:
Daniel P. B. Smith stated for the record:
SPUI, what are you seeking from this mailing list?
Attention.
Shut the fuck up.
Ooo.
- -- Sean Barrett | The other side to the Wikipedia that nobody really sean@epoptic.com | likes to talk about... is that a large portion of | the content is fairly pornographic, and actually | quite lewd. --Encyclopedia Britannica spokesman
SPUI wrote:
Sean Barrett wrote:
Daniel P. B. Smith stated for the record:
SPUI, what are you seeking from this mailing list?
Attention.
Shut the fuck up.
Continue like that and you'll be placed on moderation. Keep in mind that if you are, your posts will take an arbitrary length of time before they are reviewed.
Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
SPUI wrote:
Sean Barrett wrote:
Daniel P. B. Smith stated for the record:
SPUI, what are you seeking from this mailing list?
Attention.
Shut the fuck up.
Continue like that and you'll be placed on moderation. Keep in mind that if you are, your posts will take an arbitrary length of time before they are reviewed.
You know, it's expected that I respond like that. If I don't, people start doing that shit anyway, because they know I will. So you eat shit too.