How you figure out which pages go in the non-google section is
somewhere in between only FA and everything. Figuring out that exact
point is up to debate :P
For example you can say any article with a "dispute" tag on it... But
saying that means that some of our religion articles may not be
googlable....
The answer to your question though is in between the two extremes.
On 1/14/09, WJhonson(a)aol.com <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
<<In a message dated 1/14/2009 8:54:02 A.M.
Pacific Standard Time,
wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com writes:
Indeed but doesn't every non featured article fall under "not ready for
consumption" category?
- White Cat>>
That's odd to me. You think an article needs to be FA before we should let
people find it in a search?
That seems to be a 10 percent rule, while I'm advocating a 90 percent rule.
That is that *most* articles are ready, only the few that already undergo
AfD might (and I use "might" advisedly) not be so ready.
This is a mole hill, not a mountain.
Will Johnson
**************Inauguration '09: Get complete coverage from the nation's
capital.(http://www.aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000027)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l