--- Kevin Rector <krector(a)Compco.com> wrote:
I would agree with Tony with a caveat. For a sports
related link you can
often get a lot of information. For instance if you
go to
www.nashvillepredators.com you can get significant
information about the
team (for instance you can get the box scores for
every game the team
has ever played). This information is all freely
available to anyone who
wants it. However, -most- adult oriented sites
simply exist to take your
money and show you porn.
I would submit that there is a different level of
"commerciality"
involved between the average porn site and the
average non-porn
corporate site since the primary commodity of the
porn site is the porn
site itself.
I would think that we should be hesitant to link to
any web sites (porn
or otherwise) whose primary commodity is selling
access or "memberships"
to the website, and more liberal with links to other
types of
industries.
-Kevin
Of course you would. You're offended by the image of
one blurry breast. A porn site would certainly offend
you. I'm surprised your head didn't explode.
But if we are going to allow articles on porn stars,
and it would be a BIG fight if such a thing were
suggested, then we should allow links to their pages
and to fan pages, just as we do to any other actor,
sports figure, or human being.
RickK
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail