It isn't going to be our interpretation that makes something "legal" or not, it is the court's interpretation. There is no legality prima facie until there is case law to set a precedent.
Without the case law, we cannot show evidence that this, or that, is or isn't legal. The most we can say, is that it may not be legal as it may violate the GFDL. If a case under the GFDL ever comes to court, and the court just throws the whole GFDL concept in the trash bin, then we'll have evidence.
Until then it's a free-war zone which is why discussing it here is unlikely to get us anywhere.
Will Johnson
**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family favorites at AOL Food. (http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
This thread is ridiculous. Perhaps future posts to it could be sent directly to its participants and leave the list out?
Nathan
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
This thread is ridiculous. Perhaps future posts to it could be sent directly to its participants and leave the list out?
Nathan
I disagree, I found this thread to be very educational.