-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
If Neutrality blocked you, it appears to me that he has every
reason to have done so. Making edits with summaries such as "_// Opposed nazi censorship and anti-semitism of users here//_" and "Answered nazi abuser" as well as extremely controversial edits to articles such as [[England]] which are opposed by community consensus and continuing to make them agaist consensus - in addition to opnely supporting Rex071404 and Irismeister, users against whom extensive arbcom cases have been made for repeated violations of Wikipedia's civility and "no personal attacks" policies, for reasons on which a consensus has been reached as to their invalidity - generally do not reflect well on a person and his ability to work with Wikipedia (all of the above can be found in WikiUser's contribution list) and can rightfully be interpreted as " bad faith" and "disruptive". I've never encountered you before, so if you would like to explain the reasoning behind some of these edits you' ve made, please do, but until then I think it can safely be said that Neutrality's actions were in the interests of Wikipedia as a whole.
I await your defence to the above with interest.
~Grunt (Steven Melenchuk)>>
No you don't. You only wish to abuse me and order me around. You clearly haven't even read the relevant material and familiarised yourself with the case before lecturing me and sounding off.
Don't lie and accuse me of: ""bad faith" and "disruptive". I've never encountered you before, so if you " it's against the wikipedia guidelines. And I formally complain of THE WIKIPEDIA user Steven Melenchuk Maliciously acting in bad faith to disrupt Wikipedia in abusing the WIKI MAILING LIST to abuse me in this way.
Get your free encrypted email at http://www.cyber-rights.net