Someone with IP addresses in the vicinity of 195.93.32.8 is creating articles consisting only of someone's date of birth. I can't block it (it's cluelessness, not vandalism, anyway) because it's an AOL proxy and he gets a different address each time.
phma
Pierre Abbat wrote:
Someone with IP addresses in the vicinity of 195.93.32.8 is creating articles consisting only of someone's date of birth. I can't block it (it's cluelessness, not vandalism, anyway) because it's an AOL proxy and he gets a different address each time.
Are they *correct* birth dates?
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:14, Brion Vibber wrote:
Pierre Abbat wrote:
Someone with IP addresses in the vicinity of 195.93.32.8 is creating articles consisting only of someone's date of birth. I can't block it (it's cluelessness, not vandalism, anyway) because it's an AOL proxy and he gets a different address each time.
Are they *correct* birth dates?
I have no idea. I've never heard of them.
phma
Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Sunday 24 November 2002 19:14, Brion Vibber wrote:
Pierre Abbat wrote:
Someone with IP addresses in the vicinity of 195.93.32.8 is creating articles consisting only of someone's date of birth. I can't block it (it's cluelessness, not vandalism, anyway) because it's an AOL proxy and he gets a different address each time.
Are they *correct* birth dates?
I have no idea. I've never heard of them.
Certainly it would not be productive to start allowing extra-calendrical dates. :-) Eclecticology