David Gerard wrote: All you did was post a raw URL, with a subject header that was merely descriptive of its contents. How was James to know what you were actually interested in? I think we've moving from having inaccuracy and vandalism as our major PR problems to having notability and deletion as our PR problem instead. In a sense it's a sign of progress; people are no longer as cheesed off about how "bad" Wikipedia is, they're upset about whether it covers them or not. Shows we're now seen as an "institution". But still, it's something that should be addressed.