Sean Barrett wrote:
Tony Sidaway stated for the record:
Yeah, sure, Tony, but you're being very inconsiderate here. Think of all the people who wouldn't have been able to go to sleep with that warm glow of satisfaction that only comes from a day spent deleting other people's work.
That's a terribly negative way of looking at it. The most inconsiderate thing is that there is no process to do what Tony did, so therefore the restoration was OUT OF PROCESS! This is an unforgivable offence to the community (all praise) and Tony should probably be blocked again for the effrontery. Or RFCed again. Or something.
- d.
David Gerard wrote:
Sean Barrett wrote:
Tony Sidaway stated for the record:
Yeah, sure, Tony, but you're being very inconsiderate here. Think of all the people who wouldn't have been able to go to sleep with that warm glow of satisfaction that only comes from a day spent deleting other people's work.
That's a terribly negative way of looking at it. The most inconsiderate thing is that there is no process to do what Tony did, so therefore the restoration was OUT OF PROCESS! This is an unforgivable offence to the community (all praise) and Tony should probably be blocked again for the effrontery. Or RFCed again. Or something.
- d.
Not when the closing AfD admin encouraged him to commit this out of process act. :-p
John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]])
David Gerard wrote:
Sean Barrett wrote:
Tony Sidaway stated for the record:
Yeah, sure, Tony, but you're being very inconsiderate here. Think of all the people who wouldn't have been able to go to sleep with that warm glow of satisfaction that only comes from a day spent deleting other people's work.
That's a terribly negative way of looking at it. The most inconsiderate thing is that there is no process to do what Tony did, so therefore the restoration was OUT OF PROCESS! This is an unforgivable offence to the community (all praise) and Tony should probably be blocked again for the effrontery. Or RFCed again. Or something.
Tony & David for Deletion Coordinators?