Plautus has now rejected Ed's tuttilage and despite Jimbo's warning on his talk
page, persists in his vandalism.
I just got an email from a fellow Wikipedian (who will remain anonymous): "Please
tell me that something will happen with Plautus soon. I'm at the end of my rope with
him and I'm about to write wikipedia off if it will actually allow his nonsense to
stay in place."
Eloquence said he would support me if I re-banned Plautus, and if something doesn't
happen really soon (in the next 24 hours or so), I intend to. I'll even report myself
on the misuse of admin powers page, as long as the ban remains in place.
I know Jimbo said to show him love, but (god bless him) I think he is being overly
optomistic. Vigilantism is one thing, but I don't think it qualifies when people are
so desperate for a user to be banned that Jimbo has 6 people on his talk page begging for
it; when the RFC pages shows overwheling support for it. I'm posting this to the
mailing list in the hopes that this will spur the arbitration committee into doing
something.
--Mark Pellegrini
User: Raul654
Show replies by date