http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Snowspinner_2
I wish to apologise for and retract calling this "RFC abuse" in the original subject line. That implies Blackcat's action in bringing the RFC was in bad faith, which I don't think is the case. I do think he's *dead wrong*, however, and that twenty people working in concert to violate the deletion policy is not somehow less bad than just one doing so.
- d.
David Gerard wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Snowspinner_2
I wish to apologise for and retract calling this "RFC abuse" in the original subject line. That implies Blackcat's action in bringing the RFC was in bad faith, which I don't think is the case. I do think he's *dead wrong*, however, and that twenty people working in concert to violate the deletion policy is not somehow less bad than just one doing so.
- d.
Two policy violations in good faith do not make a right. I think the RfC is entirely appropriate, if only just to give Snowspinner the thumbs-up some people think he deserves - remember, you don't even need to be bold if everyone agrees. My personal views on this are where they belong - on the RfC.
grm_wnr