charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com wrote: Is it not amazing how often I get to articles that I improve at Wikipedia, just to discover how may redirects are missing, and me, as an expert adding them. Just because I know which to add? But I think you miss a more important aspect. Suppose I am doing a Ph.D. study, and want to become a expert in a field. What is nicer than to work with some experts in that field to create good quality articles. To many people seem under the impression that Citizendium is written solely by experts, my impression is that the bulk of the work is still done by many authors together, with a major difference that only a 'finalised' version is approved and visible for the larger public. Just imagine that a group of people works together adding a new page that do not have to fight with POV-pushers of fringe or bullshit ideas (expert guidance) and vandals (not approved, no reward for vandalism), while at the same time can benefit from the expertise of those same experts to get towards a much better article as those experts do know the literature much better, know which [[WP:V]] [[WP:RS]] to use (no blanket criteria needed anymore). Furthermore, an added incentive would be that quality contributors are being recognized by those experts, which results in better working relationships, but also more praise and feedback.... Who gets excited at that at Wikipedia? We have our gnomes doing those things, why can Citizendium not have them as well? There is no objection to grant recognized valuable contributors some extra privileges just to do that kind of jobs.... Let alone, that if I as an expert would know some of the regulars and would know the quality of their work, I would unseen approve series of redirects made by those people. Kim -- http://www.kimvdlinde.com