On 4/24/07, Joseph Reagle <reagle(a)mit.edu> wrote:
There is a (sort of tongue-in-cheek) commentary of Wikipedia that speaks of
it and its articles as something like a "debate sponge", or "conflict
attractor". I have the source somewhere in my bibliography (of thousands of
entries) but can't find it. Does this sound familiar to anyone?
A google search turns up no results.
~~~~