-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Raymond [mailto:jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:12 PM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] BLP, and admin role in overriding community review
On Wed, May 23, 2007 10:41 am, David Gerard wrote:
I woulda called it obvious myself, and I believe another arb said the same thing in rejecting the previous case.
They're different, but it's not something to discuss here anymore.
As for the rest, you pretty much avoided my question by essentially saying "if it does violate, it violates. If it doesn't, it doesn't." Well, yeah. The issue is when you have two separate opinions.
Not really - it's whether votes override policy.
Yeah, but if the policy is misinterpreted, then what?
-Jeff
Then it goes to dispute resolution for clarification.
Fred
On Wed, May 23, 2007 11:27 am, Fred Bauder wrote:
Not really - it's whether votes override policy.
Yeah, but if the policy is misinterpreted, then what?
-Jeff
Then it goes to dispute resolution for clarification.
So ArbCom is prepared to take on multiple article situations per week?
-Jeff
On Wed, May 23, 2007 11:27 am, Fred Bauder wrote:
Not really - it's whether votes override policy.
Yeah, but if the policy is misinterpreted, then what?
-Jeff
Then it goes to dispute resolution for clarification.
So ArbCom is prepared to take on multiple article situations per week?
-Jeff