From: Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com
I'm at wits end with RK.
Just check out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Gaia_philosophy&action=histor...
Note RK's edit summaries (first is reverting me, second is reverting Cimon avaro, and third is reverting Anthere):
RK (Reverting violation of standard Wikipedia protocol. Please stop the personal attacks, and stop attacking statements I NEVER MADE. Take the time to READ the actual comments.)
RK (Cimon, please stop your mass reversions, your lies about my own statements, and stop attacking things I have never said. You need to get some sort of control over your anger.)
and
RK (Reverting Anthere;'s POV violations, again. This is the English Wikipedia, and not Anthere's personal wish list of she wishes English speakers would use this term. Please ban that vandal. Seriously.)
%%%%%%
Ant :
Mav, I apology in advance, but I fear that part of what you wrote is misrepresentation :-(
Unless I seriously missed something, the comment RK made just above is a rather old one. Err...RK and I apparently disagree about something on this article (though I have not been able to distinguish what precisely yet), but he has not recently told me I was out of place on en, nor asked for me to be banned for being a vandal. That is old stuff. Err...he *suggested* that part of what I wrote a couple of days ago could be interpretated as anti-semitism, but it was rather "gently" said (so to speak). Right now (toward me at least), I see someone trying to make efforts.
%%%%%%%%
So according to RK, my restoration of a great deal of text was a violation of Wikipedia protocol and I attacked him. I did no such thing (I did mention that /he/ was the one doing the attacking though). Also according to RK Cimo avaro is a liar and has an anger management problem. Sorry, but I just don't see that. What I /do/ see is RK going ballistic on a daily basis on a number of articles. Finally according to RK Anthere writes POV text and is a vandal. That is an outrageous assertion.
I hate to say it, but I think RK is more of a hindrance to our effort than his edits are worth.
%%%%%%%%%
Ant : again, he did not write recently I was a vandal. I am not sure about the pov, but I think he did not either. I thank you for thinking that outrageous assertion (I think I will be an expert in npov writing for all cult articles in a few months). It was very nice of you Mav. All the other refs you gave are exact, and I agree it is difficult. Err...very difficult. Like walking on eggs.
I am not able to give an opinion on whether this difficulty is worth or not worth it :-( I dunno really :-(
I thank 168 for her help.
Ant
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree