Tarky-dude! Chill! Just surf over to
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(slogans)
and check out the excellently laid-out refactoring job that Martin and Cunc did!
Far out, man!!
Surfer Dude (can't keep a good man down)
Poor, Edmund W wrote:
Tarky-dude! Chill! Just surf over to
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(slogans)
and check out the excellently laid-out refactoring job that Martin and Cunc did!
Far out, man!!
Surfer Dude (can't keep a good man down)
/me slaps surfer dude over the head with a rather large trout. yuo iz n0t teh l33t
just had a thought about these slogan articles -- what if we have the title "plain", but have a standard disclaimer in the first paragraph, eg:
''This article is about the use of a controversial slogan, its derivation and cultural significance. In giving information about the slogan, Wikipedia does not approve of its use and remain neutral''
or something
''This article is about the use of a controversial slogan, its derivation and cultural significance. In giving information about the slogan, Wikipedia does not approve of its use and remain neutral''
Please don't do this. We already have too many disclaimers as it is. (Spoiler warnings being the most annoying -- someone even added one to the Santa Claus article!) With overly offensive slogans, we should simply have some indication in the title that this is an article about the slogan, not a page using or endorsing the slogan. I don't care whether you put "slogan" on the end or at the beginning, but if this becomes an unresolvable issue, I suggest a vote.
Regards,
Erik