On 20 May 2007 at 18:38:43 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Steve Summit wrote:
The last time this came up, I thought we'd tentatively decided to try rigging up a way so spoiler warnings could be dismissed by people who don't want to see them (much like the WMF announcement du jour in the page header). That seems like a pretty ideal compromise. Did that idea fall by the wayside, or what?
This does seem like a good compromose, and someone in the discussion said that it already exists. If not, we could add it.
Or, better yet, have a spoiler-spoiler warning:
WARNING: The following section contains a spoiler-warning header. Those who are offended by the presence of spoiler-warning headers in article sections should look away now.
On 5/20/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 20 May 2007 at 18:38:43 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Steve Summit wrote:
The last time this came up, I thought we'd tentatively decided to try rigging up a way so spoiler warnings could be dismissed by people who don't want to see them (much like the WMF announcement du jour in the page header). That seems like a pretty ideal compromise. Did that idea fall by the wayside, or what?
This does seem like a good compromose, and someone in the discussion
said
that it already exists. If not, we could add it.
Or, better yet, have a spoiler-spoiler warning:
WARNING: The following section contains a spoiler-warning header. Those who are offended by the presence of spoiler-warning headers in article sections should look away now.
-- == Dan == Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/ Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/ Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/
I would be satisfied with this one, if an only if it were bolded and boxed to stand out.
KP
On 21/05/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
Or, better yet, have a spoiler-spoiler warning:
WARNING: The following section contains a spoiler-warning header. Those who are offended by the presence of spoiler-warning headers in article sections should look away now.
You just spoiled the ==Plot summary== section for me!