I have accepted Tuf-Kat as a moderator and Tuf-Kat informed me that Curps would not participate in moderation over his vigilante actions unless 1. Raul654 was also involved and unless 2. the moderation was kept secret.
I do not accept Curps' conditions, so to follow the guidelines it should go to arbitration, with Curps as the defendant for his admitted vigilante action, and me as the claimant or injured party.
How this got turned into a ban for me is truly mysterious. If you look at the request I initiated, the section contains many statements from me, all of which state quite clearly that I intended to seek mediation with Curps for his vigilante action, and he admitted he did it.
The case seems open and shut to me. All of my statements in that section (my request for mediation) and the compendium I added to remind everyone which quoted the relevant statements I made confirm what I say is true.
Why is the process being ignored here? I am the claimant or injured party? Why am I the one being punished?
Codie Vickers
Plautus Satire a écrit:
I have accepted Tuf-Kat as a moderator and Tuf-Kat informed me that Curps would not participate in moderation over his vigilante actions unless 1. Raul654 was also involved and unless 2. the moderation was kept secret.
Note that the second condition is not Curps' one, but ours as a committee. Note as well, that it is not moderation, but mediation So to speak, if you wish to scream, throw insults, libel, legal threats, or sexists jokes, it is ok you do so...if you think that can help you to feel better :-)
We are not here to "moderate" your behavior, but to help you communicate with Curps and co.
This is why we request that the processus be kept private. It is more pleasant to those not involved, it allows you to express yourself a bit hotly if it is unavoidable, it allows us to rephrase your comment, so that the discussion is not impaired by mildly unnice and unfocused comment, it allows better forgive and forget afterwards.