Fred wrote:
It would require any administrator who blocks a user to set forth at least a reference to the section of [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy]] on which they rely in order for the block to be presumed valid and not subject to immediate reversal. Reasons like "troll", or "disruptive" would not be acceptable.
I will adhere to this. I think it should be policy.
Ed Poor, aka Uncle Ed
Me too, it seems pretty reasonable. Mark
--- "Poor, Edmund W" Edmund.W.Poor@abc.com wrote:
Fred wrote:
It would require any administrator who blocks a
user to set
forth at least a reference to the section of [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy]] on which they rely
in order for
the block to be presumed valid and not subject to
immediate
reversal. Reasons like "troll", or "disruptive"
would not be
acceptable.
I will adhere to this. I think it should be policy.
Ed Poor, aka Uncle Ed _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail