---Snip--- An added bonus is that the citing judge could tweak the Wikipedia entry prior to publishing his opinion so that the material more closely supports the logic of his decision. ;) ---/Snip----
It's always easy to present a good arguement when you can make up the facts to support it :)
--Mark
Gah! Why did you remerge all the requests for arbitration?
The page is nigh unreadable.
I obviously had a reason for separating out everything. Why did you put it back without comment?
If your concern is that you want to have one page that lists all the vote tallies, then let's figure out a way to do that.
Having endless entries on one page is not the way to do it.
--tc
<snip>
Sorry, this was supposed to go to Mark.
Gah.
The Cunctator, Perhaps if you make a unilateral change, and find numerous people disagreeing with it, and no one who backs you up, then it might suggest that the move wasn't wise to make in the first place.
And IIRC, it was Raul who remerged the page.
-- ambi
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:49:27 -0400, The Cunctator cunctator@kband.com wrote:
<snip>
Sorry, this was supposed to go to Mark.
Gah.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Rebecca wrote:
Perhaps if you make a unilateral change, and find numerous people disagreeing with it, and no one who backs you up, then it might suggest that the move wasn't wise to make in the first place.
And IIRC, it was Raul who remerged the page.
Well, I certainly agree with The Cunctator's change to the page, and I'm baffled as to how it got to the point where he had to fix it in the first place. The original instructions were to add material to subpages only, but people kept adding stuff to the main arbitration page anyway for some reason.
-Mark
I tried to enforce simplicity but they all got mad. They just keep adding and adding.
Fred
From: Delirium delirium@hackish.org Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:28:34 -0400 To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Requests for arbitration refactoring
Rebecca wrote:
Perhaps if you make a unilateral change, and find numerous people disagreeing with it, and no one who backs you up, then it might suggest that the move wasn't wise to make in the first place.
And IIRC, it was Raul who remerged the page.
Well, I certainly agree with The Cunctator's change to the page, and I'm baffled as to how it got to the point where he had to fix it in the first place. The original instructions were to add material to subpages only, but people kept adding stuff to the main arbitration page anyway for some reason.
-Mark
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
And Raul's solution solves both problems. So where's the issue?
-- ambi
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:41:12 -0600, Fred Bauder fredbaud@ctelco.net wrote:
I tried to enforce simplicity but they all got mad. They just keep adding and adding.
Fred
From: Delirium delirium@hackish.org Reply-To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:28:34 -0400 To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@Wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Requests for arbitration refactoring
Rebecca wrote:
Perhaps if you make a unilateral change, and find numerous people disagreeing with it, and no one who backs you up, then it might suggest that the move wasn't wise to make in the first place.
And IIRC, it was Raul who remerged the page.
Well, I certainly agree with The Cunctator's change to the page, and I'm baffled as to how it got to the point where he had to fix it in the first place. The original instructions were to add material to subpages only, but people kept adding stuff to the main arbitration page anyway for some reason.
-Mark
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l