Thats more meant to be a food for thought sort of thing. If the RfA tanks, the user has areas to work on.
----- Original Message ---- From: Riana wiki.riana@gmail.com To: English Wikipedia wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2008 1:29:25 PM Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Admin, RFA, RFB and whatnot...
On 06/03/2008, Geoffrey Plourde geo.plrd@yahoo.com wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. Maybe we should restrict it down to answer a three part question. A. Do you trust this user? B. Why/Why not? C. What can this user do to earn your trust?
re point C - what can I possibly do in 7 days to earn someone's trust that I have not done in 12 months and 13000+ actions as an admin, and in almost 2 years and 30000+ edits? I can answer questions to death... I can't invent a cure for cancer.
On 06/03/2008, Geoffrey Plourde geo.plrd@yahoo.com wrote:
Thats more meant to be a food for thought sort of thing. If the RfA tanks, the user has areas to work on.
The enmities here are so strong, I could wait 3 more years and people would still oppose. I ran knowing people would oppose based on this. Shrug.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Riana wiki.riana@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/03/2008, Geoffrey Plourde geo.plrd@yahoo.com wrote:
Thats more meant to be a food for thought sort of thing. If the RfA tanks, the user has areas to work on.
The enmities here are so strong, I could wait 3 more years and people would still oppose. I ran knowing people would oppose based on this. Shrug.
-- Riana
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Riana http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Riana _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I hope it passes. I don't know what would lead one to nominate Kelly Martin for admin, but it's really not a big deal, and I don't think so much an instance of bad judgment as just a "...Huh? Kelly Martin? Admin? God forbid, but not like it would ever pass anyway." Putting something up for community review is not an instance of -bad- judgment, quite the opposite, even if the community ultimately disagrees with you. Opposes based on that or the "fuck that" page are silly, and I hope they're properly discounted. If they are, the remaining supports are a pass.