-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Nathan wrote:
Actually, Jimmy wrote on his talkpage that he
considers the proposal closed
and successful, and that he intends to ask that the extension be enabled. He
also wrote that any of those in the 40% that opposed the trial who wished to
should formulate a compromise proposal in 7 days, to be voted upon within 14
days.
So if you would otherwise oppose on the poll, you should probably turn your
attention to what sort of compromise would be acceptable to you.
Nathan
"As an aside, I consider our BLP issue to be so important that I think
it is actually unethical to not use a tool which holds great promise
for helping with the problem, now that it has been successfully tested
elsewhere. Anyone who would like to see this tool not go into practice
needs to start by convincing people that either (a) it is ok for the
BLP vandalism problem to continue or (b) there is a better way to
solve it. Anything else, for me, is just a total non-starter."
Well. I'm glad we have such a neutral person in charge of these procedures.
- --
gwern
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAkl5KVAACgkQvpDo5Pfl1oJGwgCghZbTS3dOw5f8vOCeWfJUjtnn
aJQAn2eIFo/muYkUWcT+hjrApzst+O9T
=9m5y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----