Not quite. The first publication can be a secondary source, for instance if the New York
Times publishes an article on a car accident. A primary source is something like a census
return or, in this case, a witness statement.
The difference is that you have someone in between the source - the journalist in this
case - sifting, analysing, compiling and interpreting the primary sources.
See
for more details.
----- "Steve Bennett" <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From: "Steve Bennett"
<stevagewp(a)gmail.com>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Monday, 24 August, 2009 07:48:11 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Policies, notability et al, was Request to Wikipedians for BB...
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:13 AM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
Steve, news articles *in general* are primary
sources.
Here is how you can tell: Is what I'm reading the first time someone has
published what I'm reading?
"So and so was hit by a car today" -- primary source, first time published.
Oh, for some reason I thought primary source meant the subject
themself had published it. Like a blog, autobiography, etc. I was just
confused.
Steve
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l