On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 05:37:20AM +0000, wikien-l-request@Wikipedia.org wrote:

I have discovered the Paradigm which integrates science, and which debunks physics of its misconceptions.

An essay titled Debunking Physics and Discovery the Process of the Universe is posted at http://paradigm.blogharbor.com

A paradigm is not a theory. A paradigm is a specification of the results of our observations and experiments.

All the results of the observations and experiments of physics are specified by the Paradigm.

The application of the Paradigm is the future of science.

I invite your response.

Stephen Mooney

Mr. Mooney,

Wikipedia is a distributed project of thousands of volunteers; it has an extremely loose governance structure. There is no "editorial board" - editorial content is (usually) determined by the consensus of those who are interested in writing about those topics, on the basis of guidelines developed, mostly by consensus, over its history.

One guideline that have been with the project virtually since its inception, and on which there is a very strong consensus, has been that Wikipedia is not a venue to publish original research: see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

If your work gains the attention of a significant number of people (for instance, through publication in a prominent scientific journal and the consequent further investigation of your ideas by others, or if a book featuring your work becomes popular, or you recieve attention in the mass media, or suchlike), then it will be appropriate for Wikipedia to add material on it.

Given that your website with the explanation of your theory dates to four days ago and has not received any attention in either the scientific or general media (indeed, Google suggests that noone has linked to your website yet), at this moment material posted to Wikipedia about your work would likely be removed according to this policy.