http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Factual_er...
I posted about this to both these lists and have had no replies or comment whatsoever so far.
So unless someone comes up with really convincing reasons not to push this as the place to send companies with article concerns - and I mean as in, sending out a press release - then that's precisely what's going to happen.
In particular, are there any OTRS volunteers who can tell me if that's the best way to raise a substantial legal concern about something on en:wp?
That's fine - OTRS volunteers will forward valid requests to the OTRS legal queue, and close/deal with the insane/hysterical ones.
On 2/18/07, Jack jackdt@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Factual_er...
I posted about this to both these lists and have had no replies or comment whatsoever so far.
So unless someone comes up with really convincing reasons not to push this as the place to send companies with article concerns - and I mean as in, sending out a press release - then that's precisely what's going to happen.
In particular, are there any OTRS volunteers who can tell me if that's the best way to raise a substantial legal concern about something on en:wp?
That's fine - OTRS volunteers will forward valid requests to the OTRS legal queue, and close/deal with the insane/hysterical ones. -- user:Jeandré
I don't see where the Help Desk or the Foundation links are useful to get redress for factual errors.
Rob Smith, aka User:Nobs01
On 20/02/07, Rob Smith nobs03@gmail.com wrote:
That's fine - OTRS volunteers will forward valid requests to the OTRS legal queue, and close/deal with the insane/hysterical ones.
I don't see where the Help Desk or the Foundation links are useful to get redress for factual errors.
"Thanks for letting us know; we've fixed it" is a marvellously useful phrase.