Only two edts from this user, which seem to be OK, but his username - Mydogategodshat - seems a little beyond the borderline of good taste. Opinions, good Wikipeople?
--- Tony Wilson list@redhill.net.au wrote:
Only two edts from this user, which seem to be OK, but his username - Mydogategodshat - seems a little beyond the borderline of good taste. Opinions, good Wikipeople?
Only a username --LittleDan
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
--- Tony Wilson list@redhill.net.au wrote:
Only two edts from this user, which seem to be OK, but his username - Mydogategodshat - seems a little beyond the borderline of good taste. Opinions, good Wikipeople?
Only a username --LittleDan
But we do have policies about usernames, since they are readily visible to people who are new to the project and can give a bad impression. Some users have been asked to change their usernames, and others have volunteered to change after reviewing the policy.
At 11:35 AM 5/26/2003, you wrote:
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
--- Tony Wilson list@redhill.net.au wrote:
Only two edts from this user, which seem to be OK, but his username - Mydogategodshat - seems a little beyond the borderline of good taste. Opinions, good Wikipeople?
Only a username --LittleDan
But we do have policies about usernames, since they are readily visible to people who are new to the project and can give a bad impression. Some users have been asked to change their usernames, and others have volunteered to change after reviewing the policy.
--
--cprompt
OK, but honestly, how offensive can it really be to have someone's dog eat god's hat? I mean, come on folks...
-----
Dante Alighieri dalighieri@digitalgrapefruit.com
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of great moral crisis." -Dante Alighieri, 1265-1321
Dante Alighieri wrote:
At 11:35 AM 5/26/2003, you wrote:
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
--- Tony Wilson list@redhill.net.au wrote:
Only two edts from this user, which seem to be OK, but his username - Mydogategodshat - seems a little beyond the borderline of good taste. Opinions, good Wikipeople?
Only a username --LittleDan
But we do have policies about usernames, since they are readily visible to people who are new to the project and can give a bad impression. Some users have been asked to change their usernames, and others have volunteered to change after reviewing the policy.
--cprompt
OK, but honestly, how offensive can it really be to have someone's dog eat god's hat? I mean, come on folks...
Dante Alighieri dalighieri@digitalgrapefruit.com
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of great moral crisis." -Dante Alighieri, /1265-1321 /
Hehe, on first look I saw the word "shat", the past and past participle of "shit". I guess it goes both ways. :-)
cprompt wrote:
Dante Alighieri wrote:
--- Tony Wilson list@redhill.net.au wrote:
Only two edts from this user, which seem to be OK, but his username - Mydogategodshat - seems a little beyond the borderline of good taste. Opinions, good Wikipeople?
But we do have policies about usernames, since they are readily visible to people who are new to the project and can give a bad impression. Some users have been asked to change their usernames, and others have volunteered to change after reviewing the policy.
--cprompt
OK, but honestly, how offensive can it really be to have someone's dog eat god's hat? I mean, come on folks...
Hehe, on first look I saw the word "shat", the past and past participle of "shit". I guess it goes both ways. :-)
Yes, I saw that reading at first too, and that made the wordplay all the more interesating.. The hat is indeed going both ways :-)
Ec
cprompt wrote:
Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
--- Tony Wilson list@redhill.net.au wrote:
Only a username --LittleDanOnly two edts from this user, which seem to be OK, but his username - Mydogategodshat - seems a little beyond the borderline of good taste. Opinions, good Wikipeople?
But we do have policies about usernames, since they are readily visible to people who are new to the project and can give a bad impression. Some users have been asked to change their usernames, and others have volunteered to change after reviewing the policy.
I find absolutely nothing in bad taste about it; it's a lovely piece of absurdist humour.
Ec