Charles said:
It is being argued that xiangqi (Chinese chess) is appropriately labelled 'chess variant', when it predates chess and can't be a variant of it. So it's like saying soccer is a 'gridiron variant'.
We had a big dust-up over our Football article last year, which I helped mediate. It was finally agreed that "football" refers equally to American-rules football and to "soccer". In the US, 'football' nearly always means the American-rules game (pointy-ended ball, forward passes, lots of tackling) while "soccer" involves kicking a round ball into a net. Outside the US, where by the way most English-speaking people live, the word "football" almost always refers to round-ball game (also called affectionately "footie").
It took us several weeks to finally get this straight, but it was done with goodwill, intercultural sensitivity and a healthy dose of humor.
I hope we can try a similar approach to the issues you are raising.
Ed Poor Culturally Sensitive American
I hope we can try a similar approach to the issues you are raising.
Ed Poor Culturally Sensitive American
Well, it doesn't seem that cultural sensitivity is being built into the system. It looks more like a case-by-case cost benefit analysis.
Certainly your approach does little or nothing for the sensitivities of cultures where the primary rule is not to fuss about what you probably can't change.
Charles