By the way, would some admin (other than me) please add to the top of [[Christian-Jewish reconciliation]] the standard text about ''the neutrality of this page is disputed''? I don't dare do it myself, because of the guideline about "he who protects a page must not edit it".
Ed Poor
IMHO, I think that that is protesting the page
anyway.
This is the type of case where it's the spirit of the law, not the letter. If you think that the neutrality of the article is disputed, then you can't edit it (unless we want to change that rule partially).
LDan
If you think that the neutrality of an article is disputed, then you can't edit it even to put a lack of neutrality banner on it ?
I think this is deeply curious. One would say on the contrary that the one disputing an article could precisely be the one adding a banner. And that once an article is protected, it is so obvious that its neutrality is disputed, that anyone could put a banner without fearing to be breaching any rule.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
Anthere wrote:
[...] once an article is protected, it is so obvious that its neutrality is disputed, that anyone could put a banner without fearing to be breaching any rule.
Not to me-too, but I have to second this.
-- Jake