In a message dated 3/13/2008 6:40:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com writes:
Reliable sources? For an episode? Let me think how can we get that... Hmm... Hmm... Oh RIGHT! How about the episode itself? Its quite reliable and verifiable. Each time you watch it it is the same story, same plot.>>
----------------------------------
Agree with White Cat. We already have policy that states that simple descriptive statements do not require any source other than the object itself. "In this episode Samatha turns into a cat in order to listen-in on her mother's conversation...."
If an average viewer would express the plot in a substantially similar way, than we're just fine, within policy. We don't need to quote TV Guide in order to describe what occurred.
Will Johnson
**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
On Thursday 13 March 2008 12:45, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
If an average viewer would express the plot in a substantially similar way, than we're just fine, within policy.
And of course, even if it's not within policy (or even if it's explicitly forbiddne), so what?
We're not obligated to engage in bureaucratic masturbation.
We're supposed to do what's right, "policies" and "rules" be damned.