On 12 Mar 2006 at 13:31, Snowspinner Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 12, 2006, at 1:30 PM, geni wrote:
Pulled. Stupidity is not a valid reason for blocking.
I respectfully disagree.
Maybe we should have an IQ test score as a required criterion for admission as a Wikipedia editor, a la Mensa?
On 3/12/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
Maybe we should have an IQ test score as a required criterion for admission as a Wikipedia editor, a la Mensa?
Many a true word spoken in jest...
-- Sam, presuming that was in jest
On 3/13/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/12/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
Maybe we should have an IQ test score as a required criterion for admission as a Wikipedia editor, a la Mensa?
Many a true word spoken in jest...
We should only let Ph.D.'s edit the articles. Everyone else can suggest contributions on the talk pages.
We could call it the "New Wikipedia", or "New-pedia" for short....
On 3/14/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/13/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/12/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
Maybe we should have an IQ test score as a required criterion for admission as a Wikipedia editor, a la Mensa?
Many a true word spoken in jest...
We should only let Ph.D.'s edit the articles. Everyone else can suggest contributions on the talk pages.
We could call it the "New Wikipedia", or "New-pedia" for short....
What you have descibed is closer to Digital Universe (posebly I'm still not totaly certian what is going on there) or encarta. I don't think newpedia had the suggestions.
-- geni
On 3/13/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/14/06, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/13/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/12/06, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
Maybe we should have an IQ test score as a required criterion for admission as a Wikipedia editor, a la Mensa?
Many a true word spoken in jest...
We should only let Ph.D.'s edit the articles. Everyone else can suggest contributions on the talk pages.
We could call it the "New Wikipedia", or "New-pedia" for short....
What you have descibed is closer to Digital Universe (posebly I'm still not totaly certian what is going on there) or encarta. I don't think newpedia had the suggestions.
Nupedia did -- there just weren't many of them.