And how exactly is "pedophilia advocacy" not some neologistic term itself?
"Childlove movement" is the name by which they refer to themselves and
subsequently how they are referred to by others.
Mgm
On 12/31/05, homey2005(a)sympatico.ca <homey2005(a)sympatico.ca> wrote:
"Childlove movement" is a POV euphemism for pedophilia advocacy. There is
currently and AFD on the article at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Childlove_moveā¦,
we have a small number of pedophilia advocates (self-identified on
their user pages) who have been editing pedophilia related articles in an
attempt to promote their POV.
What this means is there may not be "consensus" at the AFD to take action
such as deleting, merging or renaming the article. However, I think it's
quite clear that the name of the article at least is POV.
Just as we would not allow a small group of dedicated anti-Semities to
maintain an article title such as "Holohoax" we shouldn't allow a small
group of pedophiles to use wikipedia to promote their preferred terminology
of "childlover".
Any ideas as to how we should handle this? If a small group of dedicated
advocates can block consensus that is a serious threat to our NPOV policy.
Homey
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l