You are being accused of trying to get around the 3RR.

"Sam Spade has broken the 3 revert rule for the Atheism article a number of times now. He insists on capitalizing all instances of "god" against all consensus. For the last 2.5 days now Sam repeatedly replaces any subsitute phrases (diety/dieties) entered in the article as attempts to compromise. He thinks that by re-editing the phrases he finds offensive and not actually reverting, he is able to side-step the 2/3rr at the Atheism article"

From where I am standing it does look as if you were guilty of doing this.

Theresa

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:01:25 -0500 (EST), Jack Lynch jacklynch@excite.com wrote:

WP:AN#Accusation_of_breaking_the_revert_rule_against_Sam_Spade

I did not revert three times. Indeed, I was quite careful not to.

Please look into this matter.

Thank you

---

Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l