In a message dated 2/23/2008 3:41:37 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, geniice@gmail.com writes:
Before we started to enforce that rather a lot of our celebrity bios were illustrated by unfree images. Now days We have a surprising large collection of free images of celebs.>>
-------------------------------------------- No one, that I know, has a problem using free images where they exist. The problem is, when editors remove Fair Use images because a free one *might* exist, without actually having or adding any free image. So the article goes image-less simply because of a POINT.
That's not helpful.
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
On 23/02/2008, WJhonson@aol.com WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
No one, that I know, has a problem using free images where they exist. The problem is, when editors remove Fair Use images because a free one *might* exist, without actually having or adding any free image. So the article goes image-less simply because of a POINT.
One of the important aspects to claiming fair use of a copyrighted work is that a replacement for it is not possible.
This is a very different thing from "we haven't got around to finding a replacement yet, so we'll use this until we do".