Risker wrote:
Hmmm...says it's redirected and protected to prevent re-creation. Shouldn't that be pro-creation?
Considering that its origin is particularly due to dissatisfaction with Wikipedia's presentation of issues like evolution and intelligent design, why on earth would Conservapedia want to prevent pro-creation viewpoints from being aired?
--Michael Snow
Michael Snow wrote:
Risker wrote:
Hmmm...says it's redirected and protected to prevent re-creation. Shouldn't that be pro-creation?
Considering that its origin is particularly due to dissatisfaction with Wikipedia's presentation of issues like evolution and intelligent design, why on earth would Conservapedia want to prevent pro-creation viewpoints from being aired?
There were some 19th century communalist religious movements that sought to prevent procreation among members. Over time this policy had serious consequences on the growth of these communities.
Ec