On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:56 AM, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/9/23 Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>rg>:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:38 AM,
<WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
> The underlying point is that only individuals
> can create true works of beauty. That to her mind, a collective can
never
create a
work of beauty.
"In any collaboration between two men (or two groups) who hold different
basic principles, it is the more evil or irrational one who wins."- Ayn
Rand
Seems rather damning of the Wikipedia process, where good and rational
people are expected to work hand in hand collaborating with evil and
irrational ones.
Only if you accept Ayn Rand's rather deluded view of evil.
Even with Ayn Rand's (certainly unconventional) definition of evil, it's
still a bold statement, and, if true, it still would be rather damning of
the Wikipedia process.
On the other hand, I don't know if I believe it to be true or not. And
taken narrowly, it only covers a situation consisting of two people.
Wikipedia POV fights tend to involve more than two people, which gives the
majority faction a natural advantage.
But it is, in my opinion, one thing Knol has going for it. If only they
could fix the bugs, and figure out a decent system for internal linking.
How good was Wikipedia when it was the same age as Knol?