This evening, I chanced upon the following article:
[[Media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict]]
How is it possible, with all our well-formulated theories of NPOV and our vigilant editors, that such an horrendous text remains on the wikipedia? I have listed it on VfD (but it appears that it has been there before).
I am disgusted.
V.
Viajero wrote:
This evening, I chanced upon the following article:
[[Media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict]]
How is it possible, with all our well-formulated theories of NPOV and our vigilant editors, that such an horrendous text remains on the wikipedia? I have listed it on VfD (but it appears that it has been there before).
Do you know what NPOV means? It certainly doesn't mean we list pages on VfD if we don't like them.
Instead, we edit them.
Timwi
Viajero wrote:
This evening, I chanced upon the following article:
[[Media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict]]
How is it possible, with all our well-formulated theories of NPOV and our vigilant editors, that such an horrendous text remains on the wikipedia? I have listed it on VfD (but it appears that it has been there before).
I am disgusted.
If you're that easily disgusted, you must not have edited any Israeli-Palestinian articles on Wikipedia. A huge number are rabidly biased, probably an equal number to either side. [[List of villages destroyed during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war]] is still there, despite being listed on VfD several times, for example, and it hardly seems worth listing it again, despite it being a biased collection of unreliable data taken solely from a single openly biased source (some site advocating the "right of return" for Palestinians displaced in the 1948 war).
-Mark