The Signpost (on en-wikipedia) is also collecting news articles as
well, and may have better English-language coverage (the other site is
good as a starting point for the worldwide coverage, but attempting to
be comprehensive with something like that is laudable if difficult -
at some point the coverage of Wikipedia outstripped the ability of
Wikipedians to document it - wonder what that says about Wikipedia).
In fact, I have a theory that Wikipedia makes only *part* of the
Internet not suck. (that should be in a new post).
Carcharoth
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Steven Walling
<steven.walling(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The Economist is in there. The FT piece probably
isn't because they've
paywalled their site.
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Charles Matthews <
charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
On 12/01/2011 23:59, phoebe ayers wrote:
All of those things are true, to my knowledge :)
There's a page to collect Wikipedia10 media coverage at:
http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_coverage
Three pieces of BBC coverage today: a World Service documentary
(
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2011/01/110111_wikipedia_at…
)
and a short report from Jimbo's party on the PM programme (radio). Also
main BBC TV news with User:Chase Me Ladies, I'm the Cavalry. There was a
Financial Times piece, and something in The Economist (? - not seen that
yet). All-in-all that page seems to need work.
Charles
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l