There has been no explanation as to how this alleged consensus has taken place. Its because there is no actual consensus on this. The only consensus that exists is merely between the people on one side of the dispute. . Alkivar has certainly abused his power on this occasion. I have tried to find out how to contact Alkivar however Ive found it to be exceedingly obscure to contact and reason with him. Can anyone help me in this regard.
_________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:17:55 -0400, you wrote:
There has been no explanation as to how this alleged consensus has taken place. Its because there is no actual consensus on this. The only consensus that exists is merely between the people on one side of the dispute. . Alkivar has certainly abused his power on this occasion. I have tried to find out how to contact Alkivar however Ive found it to be exceedingly obscure to contact and reason with him. Can anyone help me in this regard.
Not unless you are going to give an undertaking to discuss all edits on the Talk page and not simply wade in and revert war as you have consistently done on this article. For what it's worth I actually agree that the items to which you object should not be in the first para, but edit-warring is absolutely not the way to go about it. Guy (JzG)