Subject: [WikiEN-l] William M. Connolley- He wrote about the edit wars butit makes no sense!!!!!!!!!
Why? Because the other wikipedians are vandalizing and deleting ALL THE FACTS I WRITE that completely RELATE TO THE SUBJECT. I did not do anything wrong this time, but he is upset by the info I post. I am steaming about this. He is a horrible admin.
You'll find any number of other editors who agree with you, but this isn't the place to discuss it. As advised, use the article discussion page to talk about it in a civil and constructive manner. If you still cannot get justice*, come back with a couple of good examples and ask for help. Don't expect much if you are being a self-righteous pest.
Pete, speaking from experience
*Justice is a nebulous concept here. Wikipedia is just a website. It's not a court of law, and even the community's most senior magistrates are overworked volunteers who will aim for expedience over rigorous investigation. ---- And why isn't this is a place to discuss this? Are you, by some Divine Grace, the one to determine what one can say here?. And that which is okay to say is clearly what you say. Well just because..yes.
"a self-righteous pest"? If I didn't know better I would swear that sounds like a PA. But what would I know, I've already been labeled as a pest myslelf and banned indefinitely from editing at Wikipedia.
No. Justice is not a nebulous concept here. Justice is justice always. Wikipedia claims to be an encyclopedia and therefore based on that claim needs to keep it's controversial articles as unbiased as it can. And yet it does the opposite and does so with a vengeance. it edits out neutrality in a concerted effort that is backed by power-hungry admins and all their tireless mob of mindless editors. It happens constantly. Editors such as Peter Mackay, Lou franklinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lou_franklin, Merecat </wiki/User:Merecat>, myself thewolfstar <../wiki/User:Thewolfstar>, Tbeatty </wiki/User:Tbeatty>, Morton devonshire http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Morton_devonshire, Jerry G. Sweeton Jr </wiki/User:J.sweeton%40wnri.com> along with many others that try so hard to bring neutrality into a biased artlce constantly get stopped from doing so by a swarm of editors, who harass, revert, lie, block often with no cause and no warning.
It's time for this to stop.Maggiethewolfstar <../wiki/User:Thewolfstar> in peace and justice for the wildthings, http://earthhopenetwork.net/
From: wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org [mailto:wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org] On Behalf Of Earthhope Action Network
Subject: [WikiEN-l] William M. Connolley- He wrote about
the edit wars
butit makes no sense!!!!!!!!!
Why? Because the other wikipedians are vandalizing and deleting ALL THE FACTS I WRITE that completely RELATE TO THE SUBJECT. I
did not do
anything wrong this time, but he is upset by the info I post. I am steaming about this. He is a horrible admin.
You'll find any number of other editors who agree with you, but this isn't the place to discuss it. As advised, use the article discussion page to talk about it in a civil and constructive manner. If you still cannot get justice*, come back with a couple of good examples and ask for help. Don't expect much if you are being a self-righteous pest.
Pete, speaking from experience
*Justice is a nebulous concept here. Wikipedia is just a website. It's not a court of law, and even the community's most senior magistrates are overworked volunteers who will aim for expedience over rigorous investigation.
And why isn't this is a place to discuss this? Are you, by some Divine Grace, the one to determine what one can say here?. And that which is okay to say is clearly what you say. Well just because..yes.
You can say anything you want, but regardless of how right or wrong you are, making a big production here won't do you much good. As I say, I speak from experience.
"a self-righteous pest"? If I didn't know better I would swear that sounds like a PA. But what would I know, I've already been labeled as a pest myslelf and banned indefinitely from editing at Wikipedia.
No. Justice is not a nebulous concept here. Justice is justice always. Wikipedia claims to be an encyclopedia and therefore based on that claim needs to keep it's controversial articles as unbiased as it can. And yet it does the opposite and does so with a vengeance. it edits out neutrality in a concerted effort that is backed by power-hungry admins and all their tireless mob of mindless editors. It happens constantly. Editors such as Peter Mackay, Lou franklinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lou_franklin, Merecat </wiki/User:Merecat>, myself thewolfstar <../wiki/User:Thewolfstar>, Tbeatty </wiki/User:Tbeatty>, Morton devonshire http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Morton_devonshire, Jerry G. Sweeton Jr </wiki/User:J.sweeton%40wnri.com> along with many others that try so hard to bring neutrality into a biased artlce constantly get stopped from doing so by a swarm of editors, who harass, revert, lie, block often with no cause and no warning.
You speak from ignorance. Don't include me in your list of "power-hungry admins". I'm Skyring - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Skyring - and let me tell you, when it comes to injustice here, it comes right from the top. Deal with it.
-- Peter in Canberra