Doesnt seem so sticky. I rewrote the sentence. Apparently Mark was sticky on using the term "pseudoscience" - practically a pejorative, or at least a colored characterization.
Granted, no real scientist considers creation science to be science or any part of it. But any NPOV use of the term pseudoscience requires an explanation which may not be warranted in a one-sentence overview.
SV
--- Daniel Mayer maveric149@yahoo.com wrote:
--- Mark Pellegrini mapellegrini@comcast.net wrote:
As you can imagine, it's very much a
back-and-forth thing. Look at the
versions from earlier in the week following edits
by pro-creationist
users FuelWagon, Rossnixon and especially PWhittle
(as well as the IP
address 138.130.203.177
Sounds like another sticky issue like the climate change problem. Good thing the ArbCom has already seen this type of case before.
-- mav
__________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs